https://bitaccelerate.com
104.21.67.7 · Cloudflare, Inc.
Toronto, Canada
2846 days
200 · 16.8s
Valid· WE1, Google Trust Services, US
COMPLETED
Domain Intelligence: bitaccelerate.com
Scanned 2 times since Jun 6, 2026, 11:20 PM UTC
No KB/IOK detections were recorded for this scan.
cryptocurrency | technology · 7/19/2026
The page presents BitAccelerate branding and a Bitcoin transaction accelerator offering. However, the page title explicitly impersonates a known regulatory/anti-fraud authority (ATO) in the domain intelligence signal, and the content includes impersonation cues by referencing ATO in the title while the domain is bitaccelerate.com. Network requests and embedded third-party scripts (Matomo, copypoison.js) plus a vague FAQ describe accelerator functionality. There is no direct credential harvesting UI detected in static HTML, but the presence of a login-like form without a clear login target and the impersonation signal raise risk of misrepresentation. Overall, evidence leans toward impersonation signals overlaying a legitimate-looking BitAccelerate site rather than a clear first-party abuse; the site itself markets a service rather than distributing malware, but impersonation risk warrants caution.
Capture
Stages: 2
Canonical: Settled Render
Changed: No
Credential Signals
Forms: 1
Password fields: 0
Late-stage login UI: No
Resource Signals
Resources: 17
Hosts: 3
Domains: 3
Suspicious Endpoints
hxxps://bitaccelerate[.]com/
The page uses BitAccelerate branding to present a Bitcoin transaction accelerator, but domain intelligence flags impersonation risk due to the page title referencing ATO on a non-official domain. The site also loads external scripts from third-party domains and uses analytics in a manner common to many sites, including those attempting to evade detection. While there is no explicit credential collection form identified in static HTML, the impersonation signal combined with the suspicious off-domain script loading and the presence of a POST beacon to matomo with rich metadata suggest potential abuse or at minimum deceptive branding. Given the impersonation signal and external script loading from non-origin domains, this warrants monitoring and further verification; nothing conclusively proves phishing credential theft from this scan alone.
Monitor