https://ledger.com.ag
172.67.74.42 · Cloudflare, Inc.
Toronto, Canada
—
200 · 16.1s
Valid· WE1, Google Trust Services, US
COMPLETED
Linked Phishing Report
This scan is attached to a vendor submission report
Brand
ledger.com.ag
Vendors
30/31
Status
partial
No KB/IOK detections were recorded for this scan.
Scanner blocked by cloudflare
This scan likely captured a block/challenge page, so the AI analysis may not reflect the real site victims see.
finance | technology | ecommerce | cryptocurrency | other · 7/19/2026
The page presents Ledger-brand style cues but the hostname ledger.com.ag does not correspond to the official Ledger domain. The page title and content show a personal blog-like layout under the name “Brackenmoor Budget Notes” with no direct Ledger product UI. Domain intelligence flags impersonation risk due to the domain containing ‘ledger’ and the SSL cert is issued to ledger.com.ag. Public assets and network requests reference generic CDN paths rather than official Ledger assets. No credential harvesting or malware delivery indicators are evident in the static HTML; however, the strong impersonation signals combined with a suspicious POST to a challenge-platform endpoint suggest possible credential-capture or cloaked scripting behavior typical of impersonation attempts. Overall, the evidence leans toward potential impersonation rather than a confirmed first-party abuse, with notable signals of brand confusion and possible anti-scraping/CAPTCHA-like activity observed in network endpoints.
Capture
Stages: 2
Canonical: Settled Render
Changed: No
Credential Signals
Forms: 0
Password fields: 0
Late-stage login UI: No
Resource Signals
Resources: 7
Hosts: 3
Domains: 3
The site uses a Ledger-named domain variant and displays content unrelated to Ledger, raising impersonation risk. The presence of a challenge-platform POST endpoint and external assets suggests potential attempt to bypass or cloak credential collection, typical in phishing infrastructure. While there is no definitive evidence of credential harvesting on this domain, the strong brand-signal mismatch and WAF-like assets warrant heightened suspicion and monitoring. Recommend treating as impersonation risk with closer investigation of domain registration details and hosting lineage; monitor for user-reach and credential capture attempts. If any credential collection is confirmed, escalate to abuse actions accordingly.
Monitor